EVERY SIGNATURE MATTERS - THIS BILL MUST PASS!

EVERY SIGNATURE MATTERS - THIS BILL MUST PASS!
CLICK - GOAL - 100,000 NEW SIGNATURES! 75,000 SIGNATURES HAVE ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED TO GOVERNOR CUOMO!

CLICK!

Friday, April 19, 2024

I speak now to our enemies, who sacrifice their own families in order to destroy ours: Fear us. Fear the men who value peace, but are dragged to war. Fear the men whom you’ve forced to leave their families, and who would do anything to return to them. Fear the warriors you have created with your senseless cruelty, with your hate. With your passion for blood and violence. Fear those who don’t fear you, who see you for what you are.

 

I am a father and a soldier. I have a message for our enemies (Jewish Ones As Well -Those Who Mock Us For Sacrificing Our Lives For Our ONE Jewish Country)

 

To those who sacrifice their own families in order to destroy ours: Fear us. Fear the men who value peace, but are dragged to war 
 
 
With my son, moments before returning to Southern Gaza in January 2024
 
 

The last few moments. Moments of peace, of love, of home. Fleeting moments, moments that never remain. Moments I had experienced countless times already, too many times.

My bag was packed. My boots were at the door. Uniform hung on the chair, rifle leaned against the table. Nothing to do but wait. We had been expecting an Iranian attack for some time, but who knew what would actually happen. The week passed by, Shabbat came and went silently. And then, the first reports came in: A confirmed launch. War.

For the next few hours we all held our breath, and then the booms began. Some ran to their shelters; others ran to the windows to watch the lights overhead. Some cowered in fear as shockwaves shook their apartments. I did none of these things.

To some, the booms meant definite war. It meant their kids not going to school, or their work being closed. Or flights being canceled. It meant possibly spending days in the bomb shelter. 

To me, the booms meant one thing. I felt it as I stood by my son’s crib, looking down at his beautiful, perfect face. The booms meant that I would once again have to leave him. Leave him to go to a place I might not come back from. I had flashbacks to the first few weeks of his life, when I held him in my arms, uniformed and backpacked. Kissing him goodbye, I turned, tears in my eyes, and walked toward the vehicle that would take me back to Gaza. And here I was again, after two short months home, facing the same heart-wrenching moment. 

How could I possibly explain to him that I was protecting him by leaving him? That I was protecting his mother, and his grandparents? Or his future friends at school? If something happened to me, God forbid, would he understand? Would he forgive me? What do you do when duty and honor tell you to go but your heart screams at you to stay? You tell yourself that nothing in this world matters more than your child but then you willingly leave them. How is that possible?

I’m not special. Fathers all over the country make this decision, and I’m certain it tears them apart, just like it does me. But we go anyway. Most of us come home; to that hug, that kiss, that “I love you,” that smile. But some of us don’t, and the hug waits, the smile disappears.

As another boom hit, my phone rang, and my heart sank. At that moment, I didn’t care about the mission, or the context, or what was at stake; I just wanted to stay. To hold him, to tell him that Abba is here, that everything is ok. But deep down I knew that I couldn’t, and as I answered the call, the countdown of my last few hours at home, the last few hours with my wife and son, began. 

I speak now to our enemies, who sacrifice their own families in order to destroy ours: Fear us. Fear the men who value peace, but are dragged to war. Fear the men whom you’ve forced to leave their families, and who would do anything to return to them. Fear the warriors you have created with your senseless cruelty, with your hate. With your passion for blood and violence.  Fear those who don’t fear you, who see you for what you are. Your atrocities have only strengthened our resolve, your brutality has only fueled our determination. You seek to destroy an unbreakable people, with an unbreakable spirit. We will win this war. We will return victorious to and for our children. And you will not stand in our way. 

* * *

Postscript: My unit is already back home, awaiting further orders.

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/last-moments-at-home-and-a-message-to-our-enemies/


Avi Kahn is a father and husband living in Bet Shemesh. He made Aliyah from Columbus, Ohio in 2015 and served in the IDF as a Lone Soldier in the Paratrooper Brigade. He has fought on multiple fronts in the current war, including Kfar Aza on October 7th, Southern Gaza, and Israel's Northern border.

Thursday, April 18, 2024

Imagine If Rabbi Doron Perez, Father of fallen IDF officer Captain Daniel Perez, Was Told By The Brainless Rabbi Don Segal (Or Other Torah Moral Midgets), That His Son Died For Nothing - That If He Would Have Been In A Yeshiva He Would Have Helped Israel - Not Being In The IDF!

Father of fallen hostage: My son fought with incredible bravery


Rabbi Doron Perez, whose son was killed in action on October 7th and his body taken to Gaza, speaks about receiving the final news last month and urges the world not to allow soldiers to be forgotten during prisoner exchange negotiations.


Rabbi Doron Perez, Chairman of World Mizrachi and father of the fallen IDF soldier Captain Daniel Perez, spoke with Arutz Sheva - Israel National News about the ordeal of losing his son.

“From 6:45 in the morning until 9:01, he was in his tank with his crew, fighting with incredible bravery. Families we didn't know visited us while we mourned to say that his tank might have made the difference for them. When the second wave of terrorists came, that crew rushed their tank directly at them. It was two and a half hours of incredible heroism.”

At the beginning, Daniel Perez was declared missing and later his definition changed to hostage. Only a few months later, on March 16th, did the IDF declare that Captain Daniel Perez was dead, that he was killed in action on October 7th and that his body is being held by the Hamas terror organization in the Gaza Strip.

When the army officials asked Rabbi Perez to meet, he knew what the knock at his door meant: “I could read between the lines that it wasn't good news. You're never ready for something like that, but we were as ready as we could be. They weren't certain at first, because all they had was a video, but after review by doctors, the ISA, and the Chief Rabbinate, it was declared that there was no doubt it was him, and that he was dead.”

Apart from his own loss, Rabbi Perez shares the pain of other families of hostages. “There are going to be 133 people who will not be at the Seder this year. I've never known such pain in my life, and to know that there are other families feeling that is mind-boggling. We must do everything to bring them back.”

He referred to an important step in the process of negotiating a prisoner exchange deal. “It's harder to see male soldiers as a matter of humanitarian exchange, and we are worried that they might be forgotten. I said there's no greater humanitarian act in the world than a young man or woman who puts their life on the line to save people from an illegal invasion. In a world of political agendas, it's important that our children not fall by the wayside.”

He gives his advice for the approaching holiday: “The Haggadah, in which we read the story of the Exodus at the Seder, isn't just nostalgia - it's happening now. This year, we will once again taste both of the bitter herbs and bread of affliction of of those in Gaza, and the taste of freedom represented by the Passover sacrifice, which it's supposed to be the last taste in our mouths at the end of the night.”

 

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/388598?utm_source=activetrail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Wednesday, April 17, 2024

Baruch Hashem "Pilot N" - was not a Bench Kvetcher -According to Pilot N, without the work his squadron did, “some of the threats would have reached Israel, God forbid.”

 

IAF pilot to 'Post': Defense op was most meaningful flight of my career

 

At approximately 10 p.m. on Saturday night, N and his fellow pilots were alerted that it was time to take to the skies.



 N AND his copilot prepare their aircraft for takeoff. N was an active member of Israel’s defense systems that were activated Saturday night when Iran targeted Israel with hundreds of drones and missiles. (photo credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)
N AND his copilot prepare their aircraft for takeoff. N was an active member of Israel’s defense systems that were activated Saturday night when Iran targeted Israel with hundreds of drones and missiles.   

 

“This past Saturday, I flew on the most meaningful flight I have ever made,” Maj. N, an Israel Air Force (IAF) pilot in Squadron 122 who has been on reserve duty since October 7, told The Jerusalem Post on Monday.

He was referring, of course, to Israel’s broad defense operation amid the multifaceted airstrikes launched by the Islamic Regime, titled Iron Shield.

While N was faced with disappointment on Friday when he told his wife that he would not be coming home that night – or that entire weekend, for that matter – he was filled with both “excitement” and “focus,” once he was briefed on the historic operation he would be partaking in.

The IDF – and, indeed, the world – understood quite early on that an Iranian attack was imminent. Israel’s defense systems needed only to be prepared.

At approximately 10 p.m. on Saturday night, N and his fellow pilots were alerted that it was time to take to the skies.

 Israel Air Force jet after intercepting Iranian drones and missiles. April 14, 2024. (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)
Israel Air Force jet after intercepting Iranian drones and missiles. April 14, 2024
 
 

“I’ve been a pilot for over 20 years, and I have participated in many operations, both in and out of Israel. This was the most meaningful flight [yet],” he said. “Since October 7, we, like all of the air force, moved to the highest alertness level, whether it be relating to Gaza or further threats.”

That night, Israel deployed Eitam, Shavit, and Oron aircraft to detect, report, and ultimately help remove airborne threats.

Eitams are Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) surveillance planes outfitted with more than $100 million worth of radar and command-and-control systems.

Shavits are intelligence-gathering planes with high altitudes, long flight ranges, and advanced system capabilities. They can detect the operation of electronic systems hundreds of kilometers away and in remote areas.

Orons are high-performance, low-maintenance aircraft equipped with advanced radar and intelligence systems that create real-time, comprehensive intelligence images. This was the type of aircraft N flew on Saturday night.

“We worked to recognize the threats and let the [Operations Division] and the fighter pilots know what the biggest threats were,” N explained. “The controllers in the back speak with the fighter pilots.

'It was like a computer game'

“We were in a very strategic location in the middle of the sky. We were the first to recognize and see what was coming. It was like a computer game.

 Israel Air Force jet after intercepting Iranian drones and missiles. April 14, 2024. (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)
Israel Air Force jet after intercepting Iranian drones and missiles. April 14, 2024. 
 

“I told them, ‘This target is on its way. We need to down this,’” he continued. “You suddenly realize, ‘My god, what am I doing? I cannot mess this up.’ Luckily, our team of controllers are such professionals. We passed messages on to them. It was excellent cooperation.”

According to him, without the work his squadron did, “some of the threats would have reached Israel, God forbid.”

Indeed, IDF Spokesperson R.-Adm. Daniel Hagari revealed, following the operation, that 99% of the aerial threats were shot down, and none of the 200 drones and 30 cruise missiles dispatched got through to Israeli territory at all.

The intel gathered by N and his teammates was ultimately the information that allowed aircraft, David’s Sling, or the Arrow missile systems to down the looming airborne threats. The Iron Dome, which defends well against Hamas and Hezbollah’s simple rockets, is less relevant for drones and fancier long-range missiles.

N, when asked how he felt after the operation, said that he was not able to sleep for days after.

“Only now, three days later, do I understand what I experienced there,” he said. “I experienced what it was like to participate in something far bigger than myself. I needed to protect the country in the most pure place physically. I feel that this was very meaningful and that I physically safeguarded Israel from the 60 tons of weapons.”

After they all landed safely, the pilots and controllers, along with their commanders, met for a debriefing, as the Air Force does regularly.

“A truly honest debriefing is central to us,” N said. “We are always looking to improve. We are ready for any threat. We are always practicing, always sharpening our knives.

“Not for a single moment do we forget the hostages,” N concluded tearfully. “Our main goal is to return them. I wish only for freedom for our hostages, that they return healthy and well, and that all the soldiers, reservists or not, come back home, amen.”

Squadron 122 was, as N described it, an “irreplaceable and crucial part of this operation.”

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-797337?

Tuesday, April 16, 2024

When A Moral Society Collapses You Get O.J. Museums & Donald Trump! *The white Ford Bronco that O.J. Simpson fled in is one of the most popular exhibits at the museum*

 


The O.J. Simpson White Bronco Is Now a Museum Piece. In Tennessee.

 

The vehicle that Simpson fled in as 95 million Americans watched on television is on display at the Alcatraz East Crime Museum in Pigeon Forge, Tenn.

 

 

A white Ford Bronco in a museum, next to an old-fashioned 1930s style car.
The white Ford Bronco that O.J. Simpson fled in is one of the most popular exhibits at the museum.


Tyler Starrett was on vacation with his family in Pigeon Forge, about 35 miles from Knoxville in eastern Tennessee, when they learned on Thursday that O.J. Simpson had died.

So they changed plans. They had heard that one of the key artifacts of the Simpson case happened to be on display nearby at the Alcatraz East Crime Museum: the 1993 white Ford Bronco that Simpson fled from the police in, just days after the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson, his former wife, and Ronald L. Goldman. They could not resist.

“If the Bronco is here in Pigeon Forge, why don’t we go see it?” Starrett, 23, said.

Starrett is too young to have been among the 95 million television viewers who watched the low-speed chase unfold on June 17, 1994, when a swarm of police cars followed the white Bronco over some 60 miles of Southern California freeways, with Simpson holding a gun to his head in the back seat. But he was among those who visited the museum to see the vehicle in person on Thursday, as a three-minute clip of the police chase played on loop in the background.

Pigeon Forge, best known for Dollywood, Dolly Parton’s theme park, is at first glance not an obvious home for such a relic. But in recent years, this town has increasingly become a place for attractions and museums dedicated to the offbeat and believe-it-or-not interests of an American tourist — including the Alcatraz East Crime Museum, which is housed in a prisonlike building designed to be a cross between the Tennessee State Prison just outside Nashville and the original Alcatraz, in San Francisco Bay.

Inside the museum, the white Bronco is one of several notorious vehicles.

It sits alongside the 1968 Volkswagen Beetle that was owned by the serial killer Ted Bundy, the 1933 Essex-Terraplane used by the bank robber John Dillinger and the so-called death car from the 1967 movie “Bonnie and Clyde,” riddled with bullet holes. (A Pigeon Forge snow globe featuring the museum, the Bronco and the Beetle can be purchased for $10.99 in the gift shop.)

“There are events in history that will always stick in people’s minds, and I think the O.J. chase is one of those for a large number of people,” said Ally Pennington, the artifacts and projects manager for the museum.

The chase, captured by news helicopters and broadcast live on television, gripped the nation. Networks interrupted Game 5 of the N.B.A. finals and prime-time shows, and brought star news anchors back to their newsrooms to narrate the scene.

 

A white Bronco on a freeway chased by more than a dozen patrol cars.
A swarm of police cars slowly chased the Bronco, which was traveling about 40 miles per hour.

Simpson, a former football star, eventually surrendered at his Los Angeles home. He was later acquitted of both sets of murder charges after an equally high-profile criminal trial, but was found liable for their deaths in a civil suit several years later.

The Bronco is among the most popular and most prominent exhibits at the privately owned museum, which opened in 2016 after a similar crime museum closed in Washington. The vehicle belonged to Al Cowlings, Simpson’s friend and former teammate, who was driving it about 40 miles per hour as Simpson fled the police.

The car was previously featured on a 2017 episode of the reality television show “Pawn Stars,” on which Mike Gilbert, a former agent for Simpson, said he purchased the car in part to keep it from potentially being used by a tour company. He unsuccessfully sought more than $1 million for it on the show.

The museum declined to say who allowed for the display of the car, citing privacy concerns.

“Different generations have different responses to it, because obviously people who watched the chase live and who were around for that respond differently,” Pennington said. She added, “Most people are just shocked to see it because it is the white Bronco from the O.J. chase and it’s such an iconic moment in history.”

Never far from the museum’s mind, Pennington said, are the victims of the crimes featured in the exhibits, or the pain experienced by those who survive them. She said that while Simpson’s death might change aspects of a temporary display recognizing the 30th anniversary of the tragedy, it planned to focus on the victims.

On Thursday, the museum had taped a label acknowledging Simpson’s death on a plexiglass case next to the Bronco that displays a set of his golf clubs. At least two visitors learned of his death from the sign.

“It was pretty wild — you’d have people arguing about it, you know, at Waffle House,” David Hardigree, who was visiting from Northern Kentucky, recalled of the Simpson trial, and the debates over whether he was guilty or not.

But his visit on Thursday, he said, was just “ironic timing.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/12/arts/television/oj-simpson-white-bronco-museum.html

Monday, April 15, 2024

"But there is one fundamental mistake here, what is called equality in burden? The truth is that those who truly bear the burden are the Yeshiva students, the holy Torah scholars".

 

Haredi Delusional Maniac leader: 'Only Yeshiva students bear the burden'


(Achzor - Not One Word Of Gratitude To The IDF. PM)


Rabbi Dan Segal commented on the Supreme Court's decision regarding the non-recruitment of haredim to the IDF, arguing that only Yeshiva students truly bear the burden of defending the country.

 

Rabbi Dan Segal
Rabbi Dan Segal - Recent Escapee

Rabbi Dan Segal, a haredi spiritual guide, commented on the Supreme Court's decision regarding the non-recruitment of haredim to the IDF, arguing that only Yeshiva students truly bear the burden of defending the country.

"Indeed, the whole of Israel is still Israel, even though there are many who err, but the whole of Israel is one whole, and therefore it is true that everyone needs to bear and contribute to the success of the whole of Israel," he said during his speech at the 'Union of Yeshivas' conference. His speech was quoted on the haredi site Kikar Hashabbat.

"But there is one fundamental mistake here, what is called equality in burden? The truth is that those who truly bear the burden are the Yeshiva students, the holy Torah scholars".

In his words, he recounted: "A free woman from Haifa told me a year ago 'I must believe that Yeshiva students have something that gives them some satisfaction, otherwise there is no explanation for why they don’t do everything that the world does, how they can stay like this without anything, there must be something that gives them much more satisfaction'. This was said by someone who never learned 'Tosafot', never said a blessing, and never had any 'closeness to God'.

"Indeed, we are the ones who truly bear the burden and the rest are results, therefore, on the contrary, we must fortify ourselves in Torah study, in prayer, in holiness, and in everything. Everyone knows that if it only concerns oneself, it’s satisfactory, but if one knows that he is responsible for others like a father who knows he is responsible for a family then he has a responsibility."

"The truth is that the dear Torah students, the keepers of the Torah and the commandments, they are the supporters of everything, of the entire Jewish nation, and of the entire situation. Equality in burden? That's not called equality! It's called us bearing the burden! The bearing of the burden is the strengthening in Torah and in prayer".

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/387930

Friday, April 12, 2024

No moral option' to continue blanket IDF exemption for "Bench Kvetchers", haredi minister says

 

1947 - AGUDATH ISRAEL KOL KOREH - PUBLIC NOTICE

Arbel added that there were 1,500 men in every haredi age-group who could be drafted immediately, and "who must be part of those carrying the burden."


Hardei's join to protest draft in Jerusalem, April 11 2024 (photo credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM)
Hardei's join to protest draft in Jerusalem, April 11 2024

The haredi public must internalize that they will need to begin committing national service, Interior Minister Moshe Arbel (Shas) said in a podcast that was published on Thursday.

The comment was rare, as haredi leaders have largely refrained from taking the side of increasing haredi service since a crisis over the issue broke out in February, when the defense ministry revealed that it was planning on overcoming a lack of manpower by increasing mandatory and reserve duty, and not by drafting thousands of haredi men, who enjoyed a blanket exemption.

The legal foundation for this exemption expired on March 31, and according to a Supreme Court temporary directive on March 28, the state is now required to draft haredi men and must provide by April a progress report on the matter. The court will hear the case of whether to make the directive permanent on June 2.

"The reality after October 7 is that the haredi public must understand and internalize that there is no moral option to continue this way," Arbel said on a podcast by an organization called "Hariv'on Herivi'i" [Hebrew for "Fourth Quarter"] that was recorded weeks ago but published on Thursday.

Hardei men must start "carrying the burden"

Arbel added that there were 1,500 men in every haredi age-group who could be drafted immediately, and "who must be part of those carrying the burden."

Hardei's join to protest draft in Jerusalem, April 11 2024 (credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM)
Hardei's join to protest draft in Jerusalem, April 11 2024 
 

"In addition, there are more than a few institutions defined as being for at-risk youth. All of these institutions – there is no justification in the world that those for whom Torah is not their vocation will not be a part of the army," Arbel said.

Arbel made similar comments during an interview with the Jerusalem Post that will be published in the Magazine section on the first Passover holiday (April 22).

According to its website, "Hariv'on Herivi'i" is an "all-Israeli civil mass movement, working for the transition of Israeli democracy from a politics of submission and victories to a 'politics of hospitality' and solutions."

Shas, which represented Sephardic Israelis, put out a statement on Thursday, apparently in response to Arbel's comment:

"The topic of the conscription law and the status of the holy yeshiva students is bestowed only in the hands of … Moetzet Chachmei HaTorah [Hebrew for "Council of Torah Sages"] … and is managed by the movement's chairman Rabbi Aryeh Deri and his representative in the negotiations Rabbi Ariel Atias. The movement's representatives were instructed not to speak at all on the topic. Shas's stance is expressed only by the Shas movement's official organs."

Arbel's comments came after a number of conflicting public statements by rabbis affiliated with the Shas in the past week. 

These included a letter signed by some of its leading rabbis calling for no conscription whatsoever, but also a statement by Rabbi Moshe Maya, a former Knesset member for Shas and current member of the Council of Torah Sages, in favor of the ongoing negotiations on the matter.

Thursday included additional developments regarding haredi conscription on a number of fronts.

On the legal front, the Attorney General's Office revealed in a letter to the government that it has yet to receive for legal examination a plan for conscription that reflects the current legal situation. 

The letter was a response to a letter from Government Secretary Yossi Fuchs to the AG demanding independent representation in the pending court case on the situation. 

The AG is the government's statutory legal counsel before the Supreme Court. Still, Fuchs claimed that there was an "essential gap" between the government and the AG's positions that was "unbridgeable." The AG's answer was that the government has yet to put forward any position whatsoever that had "real content" or was based on "fundamental professional basis," and therefore could not examine whether or not the positions were compatible.

The letter did reveal, however, that talks were being held "at a number of levels" in the defense establishment to come up with a government-proposed bill. The AG's office stressed that until such a bill passes, continuing the blanket exemption was illegal, and the government was required by law to draft haredi men of the appropriate age.

On the negotiation front, Kikar Hashabat's Yishai Cohen reported that the current number being discussed is 25% of every haredi age group. 

There are approximately 12,000 men in every age group, and this would mean 3,000 every year – far more than the current numbers. 

According to Cohen, there would also be closer oversight of yeshivot by the authorities, and sanctions if these numbers are not met.  

 

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-796584?

Thursday, April 11, 2024

How does one lose a war? This is how!

 



How to lose a war

 


A nation can lose when it halts the battle when it has momentum and then informs its enemy where it is next attacking, so the enemy can regroup, rebuild, replenish, and re-strategize. And read below to see what defeat looks like.

For most of history, nations went to war, frequently and usually at the caprice of one man, but never without a strategy for victory. It was clear what victory entailed: conquest of the enemy’s territory and subjugation of its population.

In ancient times defeat was often accompanied by the coerced renunciation of gods of the defeated enemy and its embrace of the victor’s culture. In more modern wars, the objective of World War II was the “unconditional surrender” of the Axis forces, Germany, Italy, and Japan. Many Allied soldiers died, and far more enemy civilians were ruthlessly killed, in order to achieve that goal of “unconditional surrender” rather than accept various offers of cease fires that would have left the Nazi regime in place and Japan’s emperor as ultimate authority.

Israel has never enjoyed such victories, firstly because its strategic goals have been more limited – and usually focused on survival.

The War of Independence was successful because nascent Israel repelled numerous Arab invaders, retained most of the territory granted it under the UN’s Partition Resolution and even expanded beyond it.

The Six Day War was arguably an unambiguous victory as well, given that another Arab invasion was successfully resisted, the biblical homeland of Israel was liberated, the Arab nations that invaded were sufficiently cowed at least for a few years – but mainly because Israel had no designs on Egyptian, Syrian, or Jordanian territory outside the boundaries of Israel. The notion of “unconditional surrender” had no relevance, as Israel was content to allow all Arab countries to exist as long as they allowed us to exist.

Wars that do not have the goal of “unconditional surrender” are almost by definition “limited” wars, and all subsequent conflicts have been such limited wars. Enemies attack, we defend. Enemies encroach on our land and commit acts of terror, we respond. Enemies fire rockets and missiles at our cities and we “mow the lawn,” deflate their military capabilities, and wait for the next round.

We play this macabre game and never win.

There is a second reason why victory in any form eludes us. It is because the “international community,” which includes the United States, the United Nations, and most countries across the world, impose cease fires on Israel whenever victory is close – not even the success of “unconditional surrender” but even to save our enemies and allow them to fight another day.

This is unprecedented, and uniquely applied to Jews.

Thus, the Yom Kippur War was halted with Israel on the march to Damascus, with a stronghold in Egypt west of the Suez Canal, and with the Egyptian Third Army surrounded in Sinai. Israel, under pressure, withdrew from Egypt and Syria, allowed the Third Army to escape, and wound up retreating from Sinai. Israel abandoned its positions in Egypt, while Egypt was not forced to vacate its captured land in Sinai.

This was not just a stunning diplomatic defeat; it also enabled Egypt to claim victory in the war, which otherwise would have abruptly ended in a colossal failure.

Similarly, the various incursions into Lebanon from the 1970’s through 2008, always ended with cease fires that left the PLO intact, Arafat still functioning, terror just moments away from recurring, and Hezbollah ascendant and gloating.

*The Ehud Barak-led flight from Lebanon in 2000 catapulted Hezbollah to dominance in Lebanon; Barak’s brazenness in remaining in the public eye, aggressively and abusively, his craving to be taken seriously as a commentator and social agitator, are unusually impertinent illustrations of chutzpah.

*The Olmert-Halutz catastrophic handling of the 2008 Lebanon War – including the unconscionable deaths of Jewish soldiers fighting for territory that would be abandoned the very next day as part of the cease fire – would be disqualifications for either person to be taken seriously but for the utter shamelessness that today pervades public life.

Israel’s historical handling of Gaza has been just as ineffective. For decades, there was never any intention to prevail, to subdue the enemy, and to conquer its territory. All the skirmishes, culminating in the current war, have ended inconclusively, with forced ceasefires. The obvious consequences of this policy are before our eyes: Gaza and Lebanon are powder kegs waiting to explode – and Israel is on the verge of succumbing yet again to a global demand for a cease fire that will yet again save its enemies.

How does one lose a war? This is how:

- A nation states its military objectives – such as defeat of Hamas and its liquidation as a military and political force – and then gradually abandons them under pressure.

- A nation makes pronouncements – “no food or fuel in Gaza until the hostages are release” or “no aid through Ashdod or Erez” – and then under pressure allows food and fuel to resupply our enemies, and then accepts it as its responsibility to resupply its enemy.

- A nation can lose when on its own accord it halts the battle when it has momentum and then informs its enemy in advance where it is next attacking, which gives the enemy time to regroup, rebuild, replenish, and re-strategize.

- A nation can lose when it suddenly adopts the bizarre notion that the fate of enemy civilians is the “top priority” in war – and especially when such risible ideas emanate from diplomats who care not a whit about Israeli civilians in captivity, Israeli civilians who were brutalized in their homes, and Israeli civilians who have spent months dispossessed of their homes.

- A nation allows another country with similar but not identical interests (like the United States) to micromanage the war in terms of goals, tactics, location, timing, and weaponry.

- A nation worries more about the welfare of enemy civilians than about the lives of its own soldiers.

- A nation, shocked by the appalling invasion, murder, abuse, kidnapping, and humiliation of its citizens, allows its righteous anger to dissipate, and instead begins to listen to intellectuals and novelists about how a cease fire will improve its international image.

- A nation’s media gives prominence to those voices that insist that “total victory” is impossible.

- A nation allows the defeated hostile population to remain, which enables them to prepare an insurgency campaign that will cost the lives of its soldiers and sap the spirit and will of the people.

- A nation allows disgruntled supporters of opposition parties to riot, protest, threaten, and intimidate, which encourages the enemy to believe that Israel’s society is at war with itself, collapsing from within, and cannot possibly prevail in this conflict.

And this is what defeat looks like:

- Six months after the start of the war, there are still enemy rockets and missiles falling on Ashkelon, the communities around Gaza, and in the north.

- Tens of thousands of Israelis cannot return to their homes.

- A “cease fire,” which leaves Hamas in power, a return to the status quo ante, and preparation for the next wave of missile attacks, terrorism, and response.

- The release of terrorist murderers in return for freedom for innocent hostages, which only precipitates the next round of kidnappings – for which the enemy laughs at us and pays no price.

- Israel, despite its efforts to avoid collateral damage to enemy civilians, is becoming a world pariah, whose elected government is reviled and whose internal politics are considered appropriate for world intrusion, intervention, and meddling.

- The enemies who attacked us have the world’s sympathy, and we are the world’s villain.

- The enemy leaders gloat at their successes and are considered worthy interlocutors by diplomats and other hypocrites.

I still remember when Israel was the envy of the world because of our steadfast claim that “Israel never negotiates with terrorists” and surrenders to their blackmail. Wow, that was a long time ago, for now most of what we do diplomatically is surrender to terrorists and their blackmail.

Victory is going to require more than slogans that “together we will win.” The anarchists who have been allowed to take over our streets and highways in the last year in violation of the law, and who have resumed their violent demonstrations, would rather see Israel defeated or stalemated, and certainly if a victory helps the Prime Minister remain in office.

It is time we realize what victory does look like and try to achieve it. The world hates us anyway, will not have greater love for us if a cease fire is imposed tomorrow, and, in any event, has more respect for winners than for losers.

It is not too late to achieve victory but our goals must be clear. The cardinal sin was succumbing to the obsession with the welfare of the enemy civilians – yes, those who supported, participated in, and rejoiced over the rapes, murders, and abductions of October 7.

Pursuant to (the farce known as) international law, the Gazan civilians had a legal right to “safe passage” out of a war zone. They were denied that right, not only by Egypt but also by the world community that sees Gazans as an indispensable entity for the continued war against Israel.

*We should be advocating for that right to free passage – and doing it in every television interview and every diplomatic exchange.

*We should prioritize the release of our hostages and tie it directly to the provision of humanitarian aid.

*We should reject with contempt the hypocrisy of nations who wage war, kill civilians, and see no need to apologize for it (see United States, Kabul, August 28, 2021, 10 civilians killed including 7 children, with denials that continued for weeks, and with a Biden apology to the world yet to be offered).

And then we should finish the job.

Victory entails full control over the conquered territory which can never again be used as a launching pad for terror against Israel, an enemy population that leaves because it wants to leave, sees no future for itself in that land, or is encouraged to leave because its opposition to the Jewish national idea is implacable.

We need to remind ourselves of the fundamentals of Jewish destiny that should determine our statecraft. We have returned to the land that G-d granted our forefathers after we forfeited it due to our misconduct.

Our generation was blessed to be the beneficiaries of the prophecy of ultimate return. For thousands of years until today, we have been accused by our enemies of being “robbers,” stealing other nations’ land (Rashi, Breisheet 1:1). That has not changed, and we should not expect it to change anytime soon; but it also requires us not to internalize that false indictment and pretend there is some way we can persuasively defend against it. That charge is built into the history of the world and of the Jewish people, a ubiquitous reminder that we must be worthy of this land, permeate it with holiness, sanctify it with mitzvot, and defend it for the honor of G-d and two millennia of Jews who could not defend themselves and suffered the predations of the precursors of all our enemies today.

Even in these difficult and perilous times, we should count our blessings, among which are the knowledge we have of how wars are lost – but also how wars are won, and how victory in this conflict will have positive ramifications in many spheres, and for years to come.

 

Rabbi Steven Pruzansky, Esq. was a pulpit rabbi and attorney in the United States and now lives in Israel where he teaches Torah in Modiin and serves as the Israel Region Vice-President of the Coalition for Jewish Values and the Senior Research Associate for the Jerusalem Center for Applied Policy.

 

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/388121?utm_source=activetrail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

The Science of a Solar Eclipse -- Forget the Superstitious Foolishness....

 




 

The (Second) Great American Eclipse

 

The rabbis wrestled with the celestial event, but there is still an appropriate religious way to mark it

 


Once again, and to the delight of millions, the shadow of the moon will race across North America on Monday afternoon. Those lucky enough to be under its path will see the sun’s disk totally covered by the moon, and the day turn to night, at least for a few minutes. For many (including yours truly), this will be the second time they will see a total solar eclipse. Seven years ago I was on the beach in Charleston, South Carolina. On Monday, I’ll be at the Indianapolis Zoo. I am excited. I just bought a T-shirt that says “Twice in a Lifetime.”

For most, the event is a celebration of a glorious natural event, caused by the random fact that the sun and the moon appear to us to be the same size in the sky, allowing the former to be covered by the latter. But, perhaps rather surprisingly, traditional Jewish teaching about a solar eclipse raises several profound religious questions, as the rabbis wondered what, exactly, caused it.

The classic Talmudic source on the cause of a solar eclipse is found in Tractate Sukkah 29a:

Our rabbis taught: A solar eclipse occurs on account of four things: Because the Chief of the Rabbinic Court died and was not properly eulogized, because a betrothed woman was raped in a city and none came to rescue her, because of homosexuality, and because of two brothers who were murdered together.

If you are struggling to find a common thread to these disparate events, you are not alone. Rashi (d. 1105), the greatest of the medieval Jewish commentators, despaired of doing so: “I do not know of an explanation for this,” he wrote.

But of course, we have known for centuries that a solar eclipse occurs when the moon lies between the sun and the Earth (and is on the same plane as them). If we know that a solar eclipse is a regular celestial event whose timing is predictable and precise, how then are we to understand Tractate Sukkah, which suggests that it is a divine response to human conduct? We have already noted that Rashi was unable to explain the passage, but this did not prevent others from trying to do so. The famous Maharal of Prague (d. 1609) has a lengthy explanation in his work Be’er Hagolah. He acknowledged that an eclipse is a mechanical and predictable event, but he further suggested that if there was no sin, there would indeed never be a solar eclipse. God would have designed the universe differently, and this hypothetical sin-free universe would have been created without the possibility for a solar eclipse.

Perhaps surprisingly, traditional Jewish teaching about a solar eclipse raises several religious questions, as the rabbis wondered what, exactly, caused it.

But if we extend this 16th-century thought experiment we must ask where, precisely, in a sin-free universe, would the moon be? The only way for there to be no solar eclipses in the Maharal’s imaginary universe would be for the moon to orbit the Earth at 90 degrees to the sun-Earth axis. Then it would never come between the sun and the Earth, and there could never be a solar eclipse. But this would lead to another problem. In such an orbit the moon would always be visible, and so there could never be a Rosh Chodesh, the waxing moon that signifies the beginning of a new Jewish month. The Maharal’s thought experiment provides more complications than it does solutions.

Another attempt to explain the Talmud was offered by Jonathan Eybeschutz (d. 1764). In 1751, Eybeschutz was elected as chief rabbi of the Three Communities (Altona, Hamburg, and Wandsbek), although he was later accused of being (and probably was) a secret follower of the false messiah Sabbatai Zevi. In January 1751, Eybeschutz gave a sermon in which he addressed the very same problem that the Maharal had noted: If a solar eclipse is a predictable event, how can it be in response to human conduct? His answer was novel, and certainly very creative. The Talmud in Tractate Sukkah is not actually addressing the phenomenon that we call a solar eclipse. According to Eybeschutz, the phrase in Tractate Sukkah “when a solar eclipse occurs” actually means—“when there are sunspots.”

Inventive though this is, there are two problems with this suggestion. In the first place, sunspots were almost impossible to see before the invention of the telescope. The first published description of them in Western literature was in 1611 by the largely overlooked Johannes Fabricius, and later by a contemporary of Galileo named Christoph Scheiner (though Galileo quickly claimed that he, not Scheiner was the first to correctly interpret what they were). Because sunspots are so difficult to see with the naked eye it seems very unlikely that this is what the rabbis in the Talmud were describing. But there is a second problem with this sunspot interpretation. According to Eybeschutz, sunspots “have no known cause, and have no fixed period to their appearance.” However, and even by the science of his day, this claim was not correct. In fact, both Scheiner and Galileo knew—and wrote—that sunspots were permanent (at least for a while) and moved slowly across the face of the sun in a predictable way. The suggestion that these spots are a response to human activity is therefore difficult to sustain. Furthermore, while a total solar eclipse is strikingly visible to those who are in its shadow, sunspots are, as we have noted, incredibly difficult to see with the naked eye. It would therefore make little sense that these invisible sunspots are to serve as a warning to humanity. And finally, the Talmud describes a solar eclipse as visible in only some places on Earth. While this is a correct description of a solar eclipse, sunspot activity would be visible from any place on Earth, a situation that is clearly not the one described in the Talmud.

A different suggestion was offered by the Italian R. David Pardo (d. 1792) in his work Chasdei David, posthumously published by his family in 1796. R. Pardo acknowledged that most solar eclipses are indeed predictable events, but suggested that there are other kinds of eclipses that cannot in fact be predicted, and it is these kinds of eclipses to which the Talmud is referring. Unfortunately, this suggestion has no factual basis. There are no such phenomena as an unpredictable lunar or solar eclipse, and R. Pardo’s suggestion is untenable.

More recently, the late Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson (d. 1994), wrote that while a solar eclipse was predictable, the local weather was most certainly not. On a clear day the solar eclipse would be visible, but on a cloudy day the sun’s disk would be harder to see. It was this aspect—the weather—that was under divine control, and presumably God could change it in response to the local actions of people. Elegant as this might be, this suggestion, too, has considerable problems. In the first place the weather is indeed predictable, although of course the accuracy of a weather forecast is relatively limited when compared to the accuracy of an eclipse, which can be forecast centuries ahead to the accuracy of a second. But more problematic is the fact that a total solar eclipse will be completely visible whether or not there are clouds. A cloudy day will prevent viewers on the ground from witnessing the moment of conjunction as the moon covers the disc of the sun, and also prevent them from seeing the stars. However, the other effect of a total solar eclipse—darkness as though it were night—will be just as visible.

Putting aside its causes, how might traditional Jews respond when witnessing a solar eclipse? To be specific, might we recite a blessing? There are indeed precedents for reciting a blessing when seeing an awe-inspiring event. For example, we are to make a blessing on seeing the Mediterranean Sea, or a rainbow, on hearing thunder and seeing lightning, and even on seeing an exceptional beautiful or wise person. It is perfectly understandable, therefore, when witnessing one of the greatest of nature’s spectacles, to wish to mark the event with a blessing. However, there appear to be no halachic authorities who would allow a blessing to be recited. Perhaps the first to tackle this question was the Lubavitcher Rebbe. In 1957, he was asked if it was permitted to say a brachah (blessing) on seeing a solar or lunar eclipse, and his reply was unequivocal:

There is a well-established principle that it is forbidden to institute a blessing that is not mentioned in the Talmud. And some say that the reason that no blessing was instituted is because the eclipse is a bad omen. To the contrary, it is important to pray for an omen to be annulled, and to cry out without a brachah.

Here, Rabbi Schneerson combined a halachic justification for not reciting a brachah with the classic Talmudic teaching that a solar eclipse occurs as a result of human sin. However, there are two questions with R. Schneerson’s ruling. First, it is normative Jewish practice to recite a brachah on hearing bad news like the death of a person, and second, the Talmud does not describe a solar eclipse as an omen of forthcoming disaster. It is a sign of sin, not of punishment.

R. Chaim Dovid Halevi (d. 1998) who served as the head of the Rabbinic Court of Tel Aviv and Yaffo, also ruled that we are forbidden to create new berachot, although he understood the urge to do so:

Our rabbis instituted blessings over acts of creation and powerful natural events, like lightning and thunder and so on. However, they did not do so for a lunar or solar eclipse. And if only today we could institute a blessing when we are aware that an eclipse is indeed an incredible natural event. But we cannot, for a person is forbidden to make a blessing up. If a person still wants to make some form of a blessing he should recite the verses “And David blessed … blessed are you, God, the Lord of our father Israel, who performs acts of creation.”

Finally, we should note the opinion of R. David Lau, then the chief rabbi of Modi’in and currently the Ashkenazi chief rabbi of Israel. A young man wrote to R. Lau about his experiences of observing the (partial) solar eclipse of 2001 that could be seen in Israel. He had been left wanting to make a blessing for what was, for him, an awe-inspiring cosmic occurrence. R. Lau empathized with these feelings, but noted that since the rabbis of the Talmud had not prescribed a blessing over an eclipse, it was not possible to institute such a blessing today. R. Lau noted that his own religious response to witnessing the eclipse had been to say Psalm 19, “The Heavens tell of God’s glory” and Psalm 104, “My soul will bless God.”

Monday’s total solar eclipse over North America will allow millions to witness a memorable celestial event. Even if traditional Jews will not make a blessing, there are, as we have noted, other suggestions for an appropriate religious response. On Monday at 3:06 p.m. Central Time, I shall be reciting a verse from the Book of Isaiah (40:26):

“Lift up your eyes on high, and see who has created these things, who brings out their host by number; He calls them all by name, by the greatness of His might and the strength of His power; not one of them is missing.”

Jeremy Brown is a physician and historian of science and medicine and works at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland. He is the author, most recently, of The Eleventh Plague: Jews and Pandemics from the Bible to COVID-19 (Oxford University Press), which won a 2024 National Jewish Book Award.

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/second-great-american-eclipse
 
 
 
תּוֹרַת ה' תְּמִימָה, מְשִׁיבַת נָפֶשׁ; עֵדוּת ה' נֶאֱמָנָה, מַחְכִּימַת פֶּתִי.

 
THE RAMBAM ON SUPERSTITIONS: Superstition was just folly, and nothing more; it was therefore forbidden by the Torah, which aimed at making men perfectly wise.
 

Tuesday, April 09, 2024

The Lies And Hyperbole Of The Ultra-Orthodox Rabbis From The USA To Israel --- The rabbis’ letter stated that pressures to increase Haredi participation are part of a “malicious plan” to “gather under their control” the Haredi public — the text does not explain whose control — and “reduce the number of those who observe” the commandments of the Torah.

 

40% of officers training graduates defined themselves as religiously observant so daily joint prayers are held in nearly every medium to large base. PM  

***The Lies And Hyperbole Of The Ultra-Orthodox Rabbis From The USA To Israel*** 

 

The rabbis’ letter stated that pressures to increase Haredi participation are part of a “malicious plan” to “gather under their control” the Haredi public — the text does not explain whose control — and “reduce the number of those who observe” the commandments of the Torah.


Eighteen prominent rabbis associated with the Shas party and the ultra-Orthodox Sephardi movement signed onto a document rejecting any compromise on the conscription of Haredi Jews – including those who are not studying in yeshivas.


Shas rabbis spurn compromise on Haredi draft following High Court ruling

 

As Netanyahu pursues deal with parties, letter by prominent figures with ties to Shas contradicts apparent flexibility that set Sephardi faction apart from Ashkenazi counterpart


Israelis protest outside the home of Shas leader Aryeh Deri, calling for equal conscription laws to be implemented, April 1, 2024. (Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)
Israelis protest outside the home of Shas leader Aryeh Deri, calling for equal conscription laws to be implemented
 

Eighteen prominent rabbis associated with the Shas party and the ultra-Orthodox Sephardi movement signed onto a document rejecting any compromise on the conscription of Haredi Jews – including those who are not studying in yeshivas.

The letter, published Sunday, was undersigned by yeshiva heads and influential rabbis, including Ovadia Yosef — the son of the Chief Sephardi Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef, who is named for his grandfather, the late leader of the Shas movement and party. The document conveyed a position similar to that of the leaders of Ashkenazi Haredi society, who have rejected any compromise on the issue of military conscription of ultra-Orthodox Jews.

Secular and religious pundits criticized the letter’s message, which they said constitutes a step toward radicalization that does not reflect the wishes of most Shas voters.

“Compromise will lead to ruination,” stated the document, adding that “we will not be deterred from going to prison” and “give our souls bravely and courageously to observe our holy Torah.”

Many promoters of greater participation by Haredim in carrying the burden of national service hope for greater flexibility on the issue in Sephardi society, which is seen as less insular than its Ashkenazi counterpart. Yanki Deri, the son of Aryeh Deri, the leader of the Shas faction in the Knesset, enlisted to serve in the Israel Defense Forces in November, weeks after the outbreak of war with Hamas on October 7.

The document, titled “Clear Instructions in the Face of Rulings on Conscription,” was published as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met in Jerusalem with representatives of United Torah Judaism, the Ashkenazi Haredi party, to work out an agreement on last month’s ruling by the High Court of Justice that effectively ended the transfer of subsidies for nearly 50,000 full-time Talmud students.

The state is currently formulating its legal reaction to the ruling, which barred the government from providing funds to ultra-Orthodox yeshivas for students eligible for IDF enlistment.

The rabbis’ letter stated that pressures to increase Haredi participation are part of a “malicious plan” to “gather under their control” the Haredi public — the text does not explain whose control — and “reduce the number of those who observe” the commandments of the Torah.

The document implicitly rejected a compromise offer by Welfare Minister Yaakov Mergi of Shas from February, who proposed in an interview to honor the legally required conscription of Haredi young men who are not studying in yeshivas in exchange for enshrining the controversial exemption of those who are.

This aspect of the letter triggered considerable criticism on Sunday, including by the Movement for Quality Government, which said in a statement that the letter belies the effectiveness and genuineness of negotiations with Haredi leaders on conscription.

Spokespeople for the Shas party told Ynet that the letter surprised them. But some critics, including Shilo Freid, a reporter for the religious Zionist-linked Makor Rishon newspaper, suggested this was part of a doublespeak strategy.

“Unlike the spokespeople, the rabbis from Shas put it on the table. No ‘adapted framework’ and no conscription for those who aren’t studying Torah. These are phrases to placate non-Haredim. In reality, even those who aren’t studying shouldn’t enlist as far as they’re concerned,” Freid wrote on X.

But others suggested that the undersigned rabbis – including Moshe Maya, a senior member of the Shas Council of Torah Sages, the ultimate authority of the movement represented by the party and its Knesset faction, and fellow Council member Reuven Elbaz – are “disconnected” from their movement’s rank and file, as Yediot Aharonot columnist Chen Artzi Sror phrased it.

“Unlike Litvak and Hassidic Haredi Jews who live in a bubble, every Shasnik knows soldiers from very close up and personal. Most have family in the army. They know exactly what the worried mothers look like and pray daily for their cousin or neighbor serving in the Israel Defense Forces. That’s why the rabbis’ position is so outrageous,” she wrote, adding: “This public deserves better leaders.”

Menashe Anzi, a lecturer at Ben Gurion University on the history of Jews in the Muslim world, opined that the letter exposes an internal division within Shas.

“This is the Haredi Sephardi nucleus that was Haredi long before Shas [existed],” he wrote. “The families of Haredi rabbis, like Musafi and Ben Shimon, have been in the Haredi sphere for decades, even longer. Their audiences are Haredi Sephardi. They don’t think of the traditional Jew from Petah Tikva, but of the Haredi from Beit Yisrael,” he added, naming a Haredi neighborhood in Jerusalem.

The letter follows legal action on the conscription of Haredim, which has attracted renewed scrutiny as Israeli society grapples with the burden of the war against Hamas in Gaza and the conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon. The army called up hundreds of thousands of reservists, most of whom have since been discharged, following the October 7 Hamas onslaught and the ensuing war in Gaza.

In their letter, the rabbis addressed the issue of state funding for yeshivas, urging philanthropists to fill the vacuum left by the High Court’s decision to order the state to freeze its funding for those institutions.

“In this fateful time, part of the measures are to deprive the livelihood of
Torah students to harm them and force them to leave to world of the Torah,” the rabbis wrote. “We call on the donors of our people to fund the yeshivas with all their might.”

https://www.timesofisrael.com/shas-rabbis-spurn-compromise-on-haredi-draft-following-high-court-ruling/?utm_source=The+Daily+Edition&utm_campaign=daily-edition-2024-04-08&utm_medium=email


Monday, April 08, 2024

Gazans just engaged in the most brutal deliberate attacks on Israeli civilians, and Hamas, the instigator of those attacks, is widely supported by the civilians there. Hamas has indicated great joy at Biden’s remarks, continues to state it will not relent on attacking Israel, and, in fact, after Biden’s remarks, resumed missile attacks on Israel from Gaza.

 


Moral Midgets Cook Up a War Crime


Just days ago, NSC spokesman John Kirby assured the world of the administration’s “unwavering support” for Israel in its fight for survival. President Biden authorized an arms transfer to Israel, including 1,800 MK-84 2,000-pound bombs, 500 MK-82 500-pound bombs, and 25 F-35A fighter jets. Days later, following tragic drone strikes in which seven World Central Kitchen ("WCK") workers perished, the president 

...made clear the need for Israel to announce and implement a series of specific, concrete, and measurable steps to address civilian harm, humanitarian suffering, and the safety of aid workers," according to a White House readout of the call. "He made clear that U.S. policy with respect to Gaza will be determined by our assessment of Israel's immediate action on these steps. 

Citing fake casualty reports generated by Hamas and lies about restricted aid into Gaza, Nancy Pelosi and 37 leftist Democrat Congress members signed a letter to the president and Secretary of State Antony Blinken stating, “we believe it is unjustifiable to approve these weapon transfers until the investigation into the airstrike is concluded … And we again urge you to ensure that any future military assistance to Israel, including already authorized transfers, is subject to conditions to ensure it is used in compliance with U.S. and international law.” 

All this is pretext by an administration that has released billions to Iran, the country that funds the proxy war from Gaza, Lebanon, and Yemen against Israel, and which has done everything it can to hamstring Israeli forces from responding. 

The unfortunate death of the WCK team is hardly rare. The Israeli government responded more quickly and completely than we have during similar incidents, and it doesn’t take a genius to see the Democrats playing to that significant portion of their base, which has revealed itself as deeply antisemitic.

War is Hell

The investigation of the incident revealed that a gunman was seen atop a WCK vehicle earlier, and another was suspected nearby. (It appears that this is normal going with Hamas-posted gunmen at food depot drops.) The logos on the WCK vans were invisible by night to infrared monitoring, and the officers in charge did not follow procedures, procedures set by a military that successfully has done everything possible to minimize incidental civilian casualties in circumstances where the enemy’s cynical plan is to use those civilians as shields. 

Khaled H. Zakariah, a native Egyptian with 14 years of experience in national security and counter-terrorism, points out a significant number of accidental killings of civilians by militaries, including ours, and notes that, if the U.K. and U.S. stopped selling arms to countries responsible, “we would stop manufacturing or buying arms for OUR OWN military, which has repeatedly killed civilians by mistake in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia and elsewhere.”

Here’s his list of similar war zone accidents:

  • Khair Khana wedding Afghanistan, 2008 – 47 civilians, including women and children
  • Al-Adaala Camp Bombing Sudan 1998 -- (number of civilians killed unknown)
  • Al-Majalah Airstrike, Yemen 2009 -- 41 civilians, including women and children
  • Bola Boluk Airstrike, Afghanistan 2009 -- 27 civilians
  • Sanaa Funeral Hall Strike, Yemen 2016 -- at least 140 people were killed and more than 500 injured
  • Mansoura Airstrike, Syria 2017 -- deaths of at least 150 civilians, 
  • Amran Airstrike, Yemen 2015 -- at least 30 civilians killed
  • Ghaziabad, Afghanistan, 2008 -- deaths of at least 90 civilians

Most recently, under the Biden administration, in 2021, a U.S. drone strike in Kabul killed as many as 10 civilians, including seven children. The U.S. responded that it was a “tragic mistake” and no one responsible was punished.

By contrast, Israel has achieved the lowest ratio of civilian casualties in the history of urban warfare. Israeli Defense Force chief Herzi Halevi reprimanded the head of IDF Southern Command, the Division 162 commander, and the Nahal Brigade commander. He also fired the Nahal Brigade commander’s chief of staff. 

Martha MacCallum asked John Kirby why the U.S. was treating the WCK incident so much differently than it did the Kabul casualties and got back the response of a professional weasel:

Kirby answered, “Well, look, these are events that happened three years apart, two different geographic locations, two different countries, two different sets of circumstances, two different types of threat[s] that were being evaluated, and [two completely] different militaries that were involved, with two different chains of command. So, I think we’ve got to be careful comparing both events too closely. We, too, had an independent investigation, Martha, of that incident, and that independent investigator found that there was no need for personal accountability to be had, but did find that the U.S. military needed to make some systemic changes, procedural changes in how we looked at intelligence and acted on that intelligence. The Israelis, similarly, have said the same thing about this event this week with the WCK strike, that they’re going to make some systemic changes. Now, we’re glad to hear that and we’re going to be watching to see what those changes are and how they can put them into effect. But these are two different events.”

MacCallum then cut in to say, “They’re not that different though, John… This was a trigger moment, it appears, for the White House, because, obviously, the momentum has been building to take a harder line against Israel and their tactics, but this was the event that really pushed things over the edge. And so, why is it so different, in terms of what Israel carried out, in the midst of war -- and these aid workers, and my heart breaks for them, as it does for the seven children who were with this man underneath this Hellfire missile -- but the aid workers know that they are in a war zone and that they are taking a tremendous risk, at risk of their own safety.”

Kirby responded, “Yeah, well, first, again, two different incidents. I understand that there [are] similarities here. But it would be, I think, imprudent to try to compare two things that happened three years apart in two different conflicts. That said, the Israelis have said that they made a mistake here. They have come clean about what happened, and we’re going to be looking at their report to see what we think of it as well. And they said that they’re going to improve. They need to improve the de-confliction processes with the aid workers, and that’s going to be important going forward.”

Here are some differences Kirby missed -- Kabul is thousands of miles away from us; Gaza is next door to Israel. Gazans just engaged in the most brutal deliberate attacks on Israeli civilians, and Hamas, the instigator of those attacks, is widely supported by the civilians there. Hamas has indicated great joy at Biden’s remarks, continues to state it will not relent on attacking Israel, and, in fact, after Biden’s remarks, resumed missile attacks on Israel from Gaza.

After the administration’s untoward criticism and the Democrat congressional letter, Hamas turned down yet another Israeli ceasefire offer, and Israel found and retrieved yet another Hamas hostage who had been killed while in captivity.

Words are insufficient to convey my utter disgust at Biden, Kirby, Pelosi, the Squad, and those media that publish Hamas propaganda -- moral midgets all.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/04/moral_midgets_cook_up_a_war_crime.html